Questa pagina Γ¨ semiblindata. PuΓ² essere merdificata solo da utonti non nabbi

Discussioni utente:DarkMatterMan4500

Ultimo commento: 1 anno fa, lasciato da Executive2 in merito all'argomento Thanks
Vai alla navigazione Vai alla ricerca
Segui tutte le discussioni nella Bettola, il ritrovo dei nonciclopediani! (come si discute · chat)
Attenzione

Questo utente, per motivi a noi ignoti, tende sempre a rispondere nella sua pagina di discussione.

Quindi armati di post-it e segna di controllare la mia DU ogni 4 minuti nella speranza che abbia risposto.

O in alternativa mandami una foto delle tue tette e in tal caso potrei valutare l'ipotesi di scrivere sulla tua DUΒ :*

Thank to you for reverting vandalisms while I was away.--Β WEDHROΒ BΒ AΒ πŸ—Ώ? 15:38, 11 nov 2020 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]

No worries, it's just that according to the history of this page you undid the cleaning of a useless page. It could've stayed as it was. I noticed just now that it was a previous joking message from an user. --KITT01 TALK TO ME 14:19, 19 dic 2020 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]

I see your page has been a battlefield this afternoon... Hope you're not still angry! This guy's often goin' round making troubles, I've been in an edit war with him at least three times in the last three weeks. To avoid further wars, I suggest to you, next time, to leave the page as he left it for a certain amount of time (like half an hour) and then delete the sentence he wrote in two rows: first some words and then the others, so eventually he needs to rewrite the sentence manually instead of using the "Annulla" command, and so he's less motivated. Just some advices, I love being useful here Asd --KITT01 TALK TO ME 20:41, 21 dic 2020 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]
Yes, and I wanted this stupid edit war to end, and for the record, I was rather irritated than angry. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
The user Utente:Blueyes2002 il Degustanerchie di Muli is not Blueyes, it's a fake account created by a vandal. --KITT01 TALK TO ME 08:19, 20 gen 2021 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]
I knew it all along, and Dmehus thought it was a possible legitimate alt account of Blueyes2002, but thanks for telling me this, otherwise, the user would've attempted to deceive not only me, but the entire team of CVT members. I have already notified them about this via Discord, and we need a plan prevent anymore account creations like this so we can limit impersonation accounts from spreading across the platform. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey man

Just a slight heads up, don't try to reason with the caps lock spamming dude, just revert his edits, he is completely out of his mind and we don't really know why lol Rotfl--MrApocalisse(Dimmi pure) 18:29, 20 gen 2021 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]

Got it. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Qasem Soleimani

Che cosa ti ha spinto a togliere le foto?--SilvioCaccamo Forever (rosic) 20:00, 21 feb 2021 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]

[@ SilvioCaccamo Forever] I simply thought it was vandalism at the time. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 19:45, 31 mag 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Some advice regarding vandal pages

If you see a page that is clearly just a vandalism, you should't put {{cancellazione}} on it, but{{cancella subito|1}} instead--MrApocalisse(Dimmi pure) 16:45, 9 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Okay, I'll put that down on one of my notes for next time. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 18:44, 9 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Sandbox

In that page it's allowed to do vandalism, so you shouldn't delete edits on it.
Your workmate Reception123 some days ago protected it, then Wedhro removed the protection on the page, because it's not necessary to protect it from vandalism.
To be clear, vandalism are allowed in the sandbox. Thanks for helping us --CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 15:28, 11 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Alright then. I've been patrolling this particular wiki as well for more than 6 months now, since then anyways. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:30, 11 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Edit War

Pls stop rollbacking the vandal, we must ban him before, in order to delete his vandalism only one time. -- CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 15:17, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

I saw that the abuse filter did its job, and I was about to go insane if nobody did anything about it. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:18, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
I think what I'll do instead from here on out is to revert vandalism edits at least once, rather than engage in a pointless edit war. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:24, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
Well shit, the LTA is back. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:38, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
Oh, another thing, pls answer the users like on wikipedia, using their PDU, not your. -- CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 15:41, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
PDU? DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:42, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
User Discussion Page (Pagina Discussione Utente). -- CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 15:44, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
Oh. Thanks for clarifying. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:45, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ Shouldn't the IP editor be getting blocked right about now? DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 15:46, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

IDK what are you talking about. Pls use my discussion, otherwise I won't have notifications about your messages. --CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 15:55, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)

ok... you should use this page to signal him. -- CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯a un kilometro da teπŸ’¦) 16:17, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)

Did that already. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 16:27, 14 giu 2021 (CEST)

I made no choiceΒ ;)

Actually I just proposed to do something that the italian Wikipedia is testing right now. IMO it won't do much to prevent vandalism because trolls will just switch to edit existing pages, and I don't care, to me it's like birds pooping on my windscreen: wipe it off and forget about it. The actual purpose of this thing is to prevent clutter in content namespaces and to help vetting new users. And it's just a test, we don't know if it's going to get actually used. Β WEDHROΒ BΒ AΒ πŸ—Ώ? 14:25, 25 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Ah, I see. Perhaps I made a mistake of assuming that. Should've checked it first. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 14:35, 25 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
But no worries, I'll be sure to double-check first. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 13:44, 28 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Seriously, what is that?--ExHaProblemiSempreQndTorna (rosic) 17:20, 28 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

That's just a nonsensical page created by a persistent LTA. DarkMatterMan4500 (rosic) 17:24, 28 giu 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
May I ask You if Mira needs any other translation work except for what I have already done in TranslateWiki? Thanks 😊 --Executive2 (rosic) 16:06, 21 lug 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
I think you are looking for the wrong Ip… the one you are searching for is Utwnte:Il nonciclopediano tedesco xD--Executive2 (rosic) 17:44, 29 lug 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]
Thank you man! (About recent vandalism)Β ;) --Executive2 (rosic) 08:33, 2 ago 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

No...

...you don't have (and it means that you mustn't) revert vandalism on the Nonciclopedia's Sandbox. It was created in that scope.
-- CaterinaπŸ”ž(hotπŸ”₯fedele alla linea anche quando la linea non c'Γ¨πŸ’¦) 18:48, 23 set 2021 (CEST)Rispondi[rosica]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism and btw happy Xmas! --Executive2 (rosic) 14:39, 25 dic 2022 (CET)Rispondi[rosica]